
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
sl045009 pp 2nr inaTechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: 2L LS seal at Both Sides Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0014095220000 NNF5009ADA 2LSV Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung Fasenueres Breitenma: 0,8 mm Fasenwinkel: 30 Gewicht: 690 Gramm Herstellungsland: Slowakei Nutueres Breitenma: 2,7 mm Nutdurchmesser: 72,8 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten 2NR Supplied With Two Loose Packed Retaining Rings WRE ueres Breitenmae: mm 75,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl fr
Technische Basisdaten
| Abdichtung: 2L - LS-seal at Both Sides |
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0014095220000 NNF5009ADA-2LSV |
| Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung |
| FasenÄußeres Breitenmaß: 0,8 mm |
| Fasenwinkel: 30 ° |
| Gewicht: 690 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Slowakei |
| NutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 2,7 mm |
| Nutdurchmesser: 72,8 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2NR Supplied With Two Loose-Packed Retaining Rings WRE |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 75,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl für SchmierstoffLubrikation: (n G Fett) "2800.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 40,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(b) mm 40,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.687 |
| Externe Modifikation 2R - 2 Snap Rings in O.D. |
| Innenmaße: mm 45,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| PP Lip Seals On Both Sides Of The Bearing |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 97000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 139000 |
| -0,2 mm Abstand Sprengring unteres Abmaß |
| 0 mm Abstand Ringnuten unteres Abmaß |
| 0 mm Abstand Sprengring oberes Abmaß |
| 0,2 mm Abstand Ringnuten oberes Abmaß |
| 30 ° Fasenwinkel |
| Abstand Ringnuten oberes Abmaß: 0,2 mm |
| Abstand Ringnuten unteres Abmaß: 0 mm |
| Abstand Ringnuten: 34,2 mm |
| Abstand Sprengring oberes Abmaß: 0 mm |
| Abstand Sprengring unteres Abmaß: -0,2 mm |
| Abstand der Wälzkörper: 30,5 mm |
| Außendurchmesser des Sprengrings WRE: 82 mm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 80 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 139.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C 1 34,2 mm Abstand Ringnuten |
| C r 97.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 20.200 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 1 72,8 mm Nutdurchmesser |
| Dichtring-Ø (am Bord): 61 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 97.000 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 20.200 N |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 57,5 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,6 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 139.000 N |
| T max 80 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| X 30,5 mm Abstand der Wälzkörper |
| d =1 min 57,5 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =2 61 mm Dichtring-Ø (am Bord) |
| d =3 82 mm Außendurchmesser des Sprengrings WRE |
| m 2,7 mm NutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| r a max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| t 0,8 mm FasenÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| ≈m 0,69 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 1625 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Love! Wear it all the time!
Always love these, own several!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Attractive and reliable
Very attractive color. Numbers are large enough to read. Honestly don’t know if watch is completely water resistant because have not had the opportunity to find out. Love that watch lights up!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Wife loved it!
Great summer watch! Gave a gift. Wife loved it. Pretty band, nice face. Very reasonable price for what you get. Timex seldom disappoints.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Easy to use/see
My eyesight is bad enough I cant use my cellphone at all without glasses. The clean display face and awesome backlight on this mean I can see the time any time of day or night without my glasses or a light.
Super simple to use:
Pull out the plastic protector on the crown
Pull the crown out 1 click to set/back in when done
Push on the crown for a REALLY good back light
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Almost the perfect watch
Color: Black/Blue
I have owned three earlier models of these things going back to the days when I actually ran road races. They are brilliant pieces of work. My only complaint of them was that the start/stop/split button(s)--there were two on the older models--were too small. Well, apparently Timex listens and the two small buttons are now combined into one larger one. Probably this was done years ago but I'm only now getting back into road work, so now I get to discover it.
The perfect watch? Almost. I especially like this model as my eyes are not what they used to be and the oversized face makes it easier to read. The downside to this is that it also makes the crystal easier to scratch. That's always been an issue, but I can live with it. No, the real problem with this product is, was, and apparently ever shall be, the band. Now, it could be worse, it could be a resin band (like the old ones) that will crack and break within a couple of years, but no, this is a nylon and velcro wrap style which should be just dandy, but for three glitches: 1. it's too short 2. it's too narrow (gee whiz, Timex designers, it's an oversized watch, why not a matching oversized band?) and 3. it's still resin where it attaches to the actual watch. Now, I imagine it's probably less prone to breakage in how it's implemented, but if you should choose to replace it, I can see no obvious way of removing it short of cutting it off. Really?
But these are minor complaints. I doubt it would be comfortable on anyone whose wrists are much bigger than my own, but replacement bands are everywhere, and this watch will keep time with style and it's brilliant at splits. Heck, it even functions admirably as a backup for my expensive stopwatches at our regular short track stock car events. For my money (and did I mention the price is wonderful?) the Ironman is still the best at what it does, and for what it can do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2014