Pay in installments of $543.74 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 19 - Jul 24
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1958-1970 Biscayne Extreme+ Brake System Front 4301426RFits 1958 70 Chevy Full Size Passenger Cars w CPP 2" Drop Spindles (#CP30101) Features: 1 Piece Monoblock, 6 Piston, 6S Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced 2618 Aluminum Forging Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications
Fits 1958-70 Chevy Full Size Passenger Cars w/CPP 2" Drop Spindles (#CP30101)
Features:
- 1-Piece Monoblock, 6-Piston, 6S Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced 2618 Aluminum Forging
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Chevy Full Size Pass Car 69-70 |
|---|---|
| Applications | Chevy Full Size Pass Car 55-68 |
| Axle | Front |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6S |
| Caliper Color | Red |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Type | Fixed |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D1247 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Outside Diameter | 14.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/CPP 2" Drop Spindles |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 18IN |
| Product Line | 14 Inch Extreme+ |
| Product Type | 14 Inch Extreme+ Front Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.250IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Fits CPP 2" Drop Spindles #CP30101 |
| Template | N085P |
| Title | Extreme+ Brake System Front |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.75 |
| Wheel Stud Size | 1/2-20" x 2.25" |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1958-1970 | Chevrolet | Biscayne | |
| 1958-1961 | Chevrolet | Brookwood | |
| 1969-1970 | Chevrolet | Brookwood | |
| 1958 | Chevrolet | Del Ray | |
| 1958-1961 | Chevrolet | Nomad | |
| 1958-1970 | Chevrolet | Bel Air | |
| 1966-1970 | Chevrolet | Caprice | |
| 1958-1970 | Chevrolet | Impala | |
| 1964-1967 | Chevrolet | Malibu |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Excellent socks
Size: X-Large, Color: White
Awesome love them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
very comfortable
Size: Large, Color: White
very cushioning and good value. These are my favorite socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Finally, socks that fit and are comfortable
Size: X-Large, Color: White
I wear size 12.5 Wide shoes and have been through numerous "large" socks that shrink after the first wash and then are just too small. Local stores sell very few options in XL. Decided to give these a try and I'm glad I did. I like the height (just over the ankle joint) versus low cut or no-show, which tend to allow junk into the gaps.
I like the material. It's thinner on top nd doesn't have compression areas. It's not overly thick, so if you are looking for cushion or extra support, look elsewhere. I have the same sock in a no-show in gray, but they are size L and are just a little too small, so I knew ahead what I was in for construction-wise. Those have been plenty durable, so it checks all the boxes.
I'll be ordering some XLs in black and will keep on the lookout for gray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Nice fit & holds shape
Size: Large, Color: White
Wear well. Hold up in use. Maintain a shape after multiple uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great socks / a bit expensive
Size: Large, Color: Black
These may be the Goldilocks of the socks I've tried. They have nearly the same quality as the MUCH pricier Darn Tough Vertex Ultralight Cushion Cool Max socks (also reviewed). They have better quality, and a higher price, than a similar pair of PUMA socks (also reviewed).
Pros: Very well made, with no loose stitching, comfortable forefoot and heel cushioning, good ventilation via top mesh, good arch compression, minimal logos and mostly solid color.
Cons: Price is a bit on the high side, but better than the Darn Tough socks.
I could honestly have made a good case for any of these three (ASICS, PUMA, or Darn Tough), which explains their collective high ratings. I did the top 3 reviews first. When I get a chance, I'll go back and review the average and terrible :)
If money is no object, get the Darn Tough Vertex. If you're price sensitive, and willing to compromise a bit on quality, go with the PUMAs, which is what I did. Otherwise, these ASICS are near the same quality as the Darn Tough, but less expensive. Tough decisions :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2017