1650cc (180 lbs/hr at OE 58 PSI fuel pressure) FIC Fuel Injector Clinic Injector Set for Dodge 5.2L/5.9L (1994-1998) (High-Z)(IS154-1650H)
SKU: 26763814006

1650cc (180 lbs/hr at OE 58 PSI fuel pressure) FIC Fuel Injector Clinic Injector Set for Dodge 5.2L/5.9L (1994-1998) (High-Z)(IS154-1650H)

$715.74 $795.27
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on leroyalkraft.com >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1650cc (180 lbs/hr at OE 58 PSI fuel pressure) FIC Fuel Injector Clinic Injector Set for Dodge 5.2L/5.9L (1994-1998) (High-Z)(IS154-1650H)Dodge 5. 2L 5. 9L (1994 1998) Fuel Injector Clinic Injector Set: 8x1650cc min (160lbs hr) at 3 bar (43. 5psi) fuel pressure and 180lbs hr (1900cc min) at OE 58psi (4 bar) fuel pressure. Saturated High Impedance Injectors. This injector set features easy to install, drop in fitment with the factory style connector no plug conversion required! These injectors utilize the latest technology and provide great linearity and short pulse width repeatability.

Dodge 5.2L/5.9L (1994-1998) Fuel Injector Clinic Injector Set: 8x1650cc/min (160lbs/hr) at 3 bar (43.5psi) fuel pressure and 180lbs/hr (1900cc/min) at OE 58psi (4 bar) fuel pressure. Saturated / High Impedance Injectors. This injector set features easy to install, drop-in fitment with the factory style connector – no plug conversion required! These injectors utilize the latest technology and provide great linearity and short pulse width repeatability. Plug and Play Dodge ECU Data available on our website.

Fuel Injector Clinic’s 1650cc/min high impedance injector is the largest high impedance injector compatible with all race fuels and has excellent idle performance in street driven cars while still providing enough fuel to support higher horsepower output on both E85 and gasoline.

The 1650cc high impedance injector can be used with any fuel type based on the stainless alloy valve construction. It is compatible with pump gasoline, E85, Q16, VP Import, FTW and other MTBE oxygenated race fuels!

This injector set is precisely matched using Fuel Injector Clinic's proprietary Data Match Technology. Each injector is individually serial numbered and the results are provided on the Data Match Sheet providing the most complete flow matching and latency value information available in the industry today.

Fuel Injector Clinic injectors are flow tested and rated at 43.5psi (3Bar) at 90deg F fuel temperature using calibration fluid.

Superior short pulse width control and state of the art matching make these injectors easy to tune and provide great drivability.

Fuel Injector Clinic injectors are set up to and include all o-rings needed to fit the factory application for the listed vehicle. If you are using aftermarket or other unusual setups please contact us prior to placing your order to make sure you receive injectors that fit properly.

Every injector is covered against failure caused by defects in original manufacture by our lifetime warranty.

This set of injectors requires you to change the injector plug on the wiring harness in your car. This can be done by soldering in the pigtails (included with purchase) to replace the plugs currently on your harness, or you can choose to purchase the optional plug-n-play adaptors which will convert from the type of plugs on these injectors to the plugs on your harness without any need for cutting or soldering.

This plug conversion is made necessary because FIC always chooses to provide brand new, unused injectors for its performance applications. We do not believe that increasing the chance of a failure due to using remanufactured or core program based injectors is ever warranted.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 26763814006

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 267 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Boise, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products

Donaldson Filtration P629464 AIR FILTER, SAFETY RADIALSEAL
29.27
Donaldson Filtration P633878 ACCESSORY, FILTER MINDER / Qty 8 minimum
141.86
Donaldson Filtration P617632 VACUATOR VALVE
21.67
Donaldson Filtration P614544 AIR FILTER, PANEL VENTILATION
20.93
Pokemon Scarlet & Violet Twilight Masquerade Booster Pack
11.00