SKU: 16565899079

"The History Of White's Vol. 1 & II" 1892 (SOLD)

Sale price$540.00 Regular price$600.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $150.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

"The History Of White's Vol. 1 & II" 1892 (SOLD)(Algernon) Bourke The History of White's. London: Published by the Honorable. Algernon Bourke, [1892] 2 vols, 4to. Publisher's blue cloth, spines and upper boards gilt lettered. This edition consists of five hundred copies number 475 Volume I:"The History of White's"[258] pp. Volume II:"The Betting Book of White's"[259] pp. VG Scroll Down for (20) Additional Scans: 37 38 St James's Street, in London. SW1 StatusWhite's is the oldest gentleman's club in

(Algernon) Bourke

The History of White's. London: Published by the Honorable. Algernon Bourke, [1892]

2 vols, 4to. Publisher's blue cloth, spines and upper boards gilt-lettered.

This edition consists of five hundred copies/ number 475

Volume I:
"The History of White's"
[258] pp.

Volume II:
"The Betting Book of White's"
[259] pp.

VG

Scroll Down for (20) Additional Scans:

37-38 St James's Street, in London. SW1

Status
White's is the oldest gentleman's club in London, founded in 1693, and is considered by many to be the most exclusive private club in London. Notable current members include Charles, Prince of Wales, and Prince William, Duke of Cambridge. Former British Prime Minister David Cameron, whose father Ian Cameron had been the club's chairman, was a member for fifteen years but resigned in 2008, over the club's declining to admit women.

White's continues to maintain its standards as an establishment exclusively for gentlemen; brief exceptions were made for the visits by Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 and 2016. White's is a member of the Association of London Clubs. In January 2018, calling themselves 'Women in Whites', a group of female protesters infiltrated the club to highlight its single-sex policy, one managing to gain entry by pretending to be a man. These women were removed.

History
The club was originally established at 4 Chesterfield Street, off Curzon Street in Mayfair, in 1693 by an Italian immigrant named Francesco Bianco as a hot chocolate emporium under the name Mrs. White's Chocolate House. Tickets were sold to the productions at King's Theatre and Royal Drury Lane Theatre as a side-business. White's quickly made the transition from teashop to exclusive club and in the early 18th century, it was notorious as a gambling house; those who frequented it were known as "the gamesters of White's." The club gained a reputation for both its exclusivity and the often-raffish behaviour of its members. Jonathan Swift referred to White's as the "bane of half the English nobility."

In 1778 it moved to 37–38 St James's Street. From 1783 it was the unofficial headquarters of the Tory party, while the Whigs' club Brooks's was just down the road. A few apolitical and affable gentlemen managed to belong to both. The new architecture featured a bow window on the ground floor. In the later 18th century, the table directly in front of it became a seat of distinction, the throne of the most socially influential men in the club. This belonged to the arbiter elegantiarum, Beau Brummell, until he removed to the Continent in 1816, when Lord Alvanley took the place of honour. While there, he is supposed to have once bet £3,000 on which of two raindrops would reach the bottom of a pane in the bow window. Later, the spot was reserved for the use of the 1st Duke of Wellington until his death in 1852.

Alvanley's was not the most eccentric bet in White's famous betting book. Some of those entries were on sports, but more often on political developments, especially during the chaotic years of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars. A good many were social bets, such as whether a friend would marry this year, or whom.

The club continues to maintain its tradition as a club for gentlemen members only, although one of its best-known chefs from the early 1900s was Rosa Lewis, a model for the central character in the BBC television series The Duchess of Duke Street.

There were two American members in the interwar period, one of whom was a General in the U.S. Army. Postwar American members included diplomat Edward Streator.

Prince Charles held his stag night at the club before his wedding to Lady Diana Spencer in 1981. His eldest son, Prince William, was entered as a member of the club shortly after his birth.

Clubhouse
The clubhouse is located at 37–38 St James's Street in the City of Westminster and is a Grade I listed building. Originally built in 1674 and then rebuilt in 1787–88, probably by James Wyatt, it was further altered in 1811 and the frontage was remodelled by Lockyer in 1852. Constructed of Portland stone with a slate roof it possesses the Victorian version of a Palladian façade with some French motifs. The building consists of five storeys; three principal floors of facilities for members, together with a basement and a dormered attic. In the late 1970s, the exterior was painted azure with white trim.

The Club bar is more compact than those of many other clubs. An amusing description of it, and of the rationale behind its size, may be found in chapter ten of the spy novel The Sixth Column (1951) by Peter Fleming (brother of Ian Fleming), in which the Club is thinly disguised as "Black's".

Whilst the club does not have members' accommodation, facilities include a members' dining room, a billiards room, and several rooms (including the library and the cards room) where members may socialise, or hold private dinners. The club menu revolves around British game.

Notable members
Current
David Ogilvy, 13th Earl of Airlie, KT, GCVO, PC (born 1926)
Sir Jack Stewart-Clark, 3rd Baronet (1929)
Tom Stacey (1930)
John Savile, 8th Earl of Mexborough (1931)
Sir Ian Rankin, 4th Baronet (1932)
William Weir, 3rd Viscount Weir (1933)
Sir John "Chips" Keswick (1940)
Shane Gough, 5th Viscount Gough (1941)
Sir Simon Robertson (1941)
Myles Ponsonby, 12th Earl of Bessborough (born 1941)
Malcolm Pearson, Baron Pearson of Rannoch (1942)
Norman Lamont, Baron Lamont of Lerwick (1942)
Conrad Black, Baron Black of Crossharbour, KCSG (1944)
Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 7th Marquess of Salisbury, PC, DL (1946)
The Prince of Wales (1948)
Adam Fleming (1948)
Peter St Clair-Erskine, 7th Earl of Rosslyn, QPM (1958)
Brooks Newmark, MP (1958)
Sir Richard Osborn, 9th Baronet (1958)
Simon Marquis, 3rd Earl of Woolton (1958)
Sir Nigel Burney, 4th Baronet (1959)
Rupert Soames, OBE (1959)
Nicholas Biddulph, 5th Baron Biddulph (1959)
Geordie Greig (1960)
James Newdegate, 4th Viscount Daventry (1960)
Sir Richard Kleinwort, 4th Baronet (1960)
David Faber (1961)
Piers Butler, 18th Viscount Mountgarret (1961)
Sir Charles Burrell, 10th Baronet (1962)
Edward Stanley, 19th Earl of Derby, DL (1962)
Charles Hay, 16th Earl of Kinnoull (1962)
Sir Francis Brooke, 4th Baronet (1963)
Sir Richard FitzHerbert, 9th Baronet (1963)
Charles Vivian, 7th Baron Vivian (1966)
George Bingham, 8th Earl of Lucan (1967)
Torquhil Campbell, 13th Duke of Argyll (1968)
Clifton Wrottesley, 6th Baron Wrottesley (1968)
Jay Hambro (1974)
Ashton Clanfield, Viscount Clanfield (1976)
Prince William, Duke of Cambridge (1982)
Former
Sir Charles Hanbury Williams, KB (1708–1759)
George Campbell, 6th Duke of Argyll, GCH, PC (1768–1839)
William Philip Molyneux, 2nd Earl of Sefton (1772–1838)
Beau Brummell (1778–1840)
William Arden, 2nd Baron Alvanley (1789–1849)
George Byng, 2nd Earl of Strafford (1806–1886)
Ernest Brudenell-Bruce, 3rd Marquess of Ailesbury (1811–1896)
Horatio Walpole, 4th Earl of Orford (1813–1894)
Thomas Bateson, 1st Baron Deramore (1819–1890)
Rainald Knightley, 1st Baron Knightley (1819–1895)
William FitzClarence, 2nd Earl of Munster (1824–1901)
Valentine Browne, 4th Earl of Kenmare (1825–1905)
Henry Sturt, 1st Baron Alington (1825–1904)
Wentworth Beaumont, 1st Baron Allendale (1829–1907)
Richard Boyle, 9th Earl of Cork (1829–1904)
Gilbert Heathcote-Drummond-Willoughby, 1st Earl of Ancaster (1830–1910)
Allen Bathurst, 6th Earl Bathurst (1832–1892)
Frederick Hervey, 3rd Marquess of Bristol (1834–1907)
Richard Grosvenor, 1st Baron Stalbridge (1837–1912)
Montague Guest, (1839–1909)
Henry Chaplin, 1st Viscount Chaplin (1840–1923)
The Prince of Wales, later Edward VII (1841–1910)
Archibald Acheson, 4th Earl of Gosford (1841–1922)
Charles Wynn-Carington, 1st Marquess of Lincolnshire (1843–1928)
Thomas de Grey, 6th Baron Walsingham (1843–1919)
Lord Claud Hamilton (1843–1925)
John Beresford, 5th Marquess of Waterford (1844–1895)
Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 5th Marquess of Lansdowne (1845–1927)
Edward Digby, 10th Baron Digby (1846–1920)
Alexander Duff, 1st Duke of Fife (1849–1912)
The Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn (1850–1942)
John Lonsdale, 1st Baron Armaghdale (1850–1924)
William Legge, 6th Earl of Dartmouth (1851–1936)
Walter Long, 1st Viscount Long (1854–1924)
Archibald Grove (1855–1920)
Charles William Mills, 2nd Baron Hillingdon (1855–1919)
William Cavendish-Bentinck, 6th Duke of Portland (1857–1943)
Charles Cochrane-Baillie, 2nd Baron Lamington (1860–1940)
Charles Edward Hill-Trevor, 3rd Baron Trevor (1863–1950)
Wilfrid Ashley, 1st Baron Mount Temple (1867–1939)
Victor Cavendish, 9th Duke of Devonshire (1868–1938)
Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild (1868–1937)
J. E. B. Seely, 1st Baron Mottistone (1868–1947)
George Gibbs, 1st Baron Wraxall (1873–1931)
Ivor Guest, 1st Viscount Wimborne (1873–1939)
Major General Sir Stewart Menzies, KCB, KCMG, DSO, MC (1890–1968)
Arthur Robert Mills, 3rd Baron Hillingdon (1891–1952)
Squadron Leader Lord Edward Arthur Grosvenor (1892–1929)
Sir Lionel Fraser (1895–1965)
Oswald Mosley (1896–1980)
Brendan Bracken, 1st Viscount Bracken (1901–1958)
Evelyn Waugh (1903–1966)
Captain Philip Dunne, MC (1904–1965)
Loel Guinnes (1906–1988)
David Niven (1909–1983)
Randolph Churchill (1911–1968)
Arthur Ponsonby, 11th Earl of Bessborough (1912–2002)
Squadron Leader Christopher "Jack" Riddle, RAF (1914–2009)
Peter Rawlinson, Baron Rawlinson of Ewell, PC, QC (1919–2006)
Christopher Soames (1920–1987)
Sir William Dugdale, 2nd Baronet (1922–2014)
Pieter Kenyon Fleming-Voltelyn van der Byl, ID (1923–1999)
Colin Ingleby-Mackenzie (1933–2006)
Anthony Brand, 6th Viscount Hampden (1937–2008)
David Cameron (until 2008)
Michael Onslow, 7th Earl of Onslow (1938–2011)
David Hatendi (1953–2012)
Henry Cubitt, 4th Baron Ashcombe (1924–2013)
Sir Run Run Shaw (1907–2014)
Sir Jocelyn Stevens, CVO (1932–2014)
John Spencer-Churchill, 11th Duke of Marlborough, DL, JP (1926–2014)
Michael Sandberg, Baron Sandberg, CBE (1927–2017)
Marcus Kimball, Baron Kimball, DL (1928–2014)
Prince Rupert zu Loewenstein-Wertheim-Freudenberg (1933–2014)
John Beresford, 8th Marquess of Waterford (1933–2015)
William Murray, 8th Earl of Mansfield and Mansfield, DL, JP (1930–2015)
John Denison-Pender, 3rd Baron Pender (1933–2016)
David Somerset, 11th Duke of Beaufort (1928–2017)
Col. John Slim, 2nd Viscount Slim, OBE, DL (1927–2019)
Edward Streator (1930-2019)

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 16565899079

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jonathan Bailey
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible. Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all. The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any. I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology. Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate. Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
S
Verified Purchase
Stone Dog
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization. The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more. David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt. When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters. This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground. I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed. This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Great book. Not an easy read but worth going ...
Format: Hardcover
Wish I had known about this book when it was published! Great book. Not an easy read but worth going thru more than once with great info. I have long held the belief of the early exodus date due to the Great Pyramid dating. Have read in many books about the confusion of the Egyptian chronology but this is the first one I've seen that really opens it up for examination.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2016
P
Verified Purchase
PhiloX
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
A Lost Book doesn't Make Up for Lost Time
Format: Paperback
I bought the hard back copy of this book years ago & what an interesting read with great time lines & beautiful color photos. Someone borrowed the book & I forgot who I loaned it to. After years of trying to remember where it went, I at last bought it again as a paper back through Amazon.com. It's a used book with no marks & only a slight indentation on a few pages on the side. Now that I am looking into it & remembering it once again, I am over loaded with too many historical theories. Maybe it's my fault for being a book reader rather than an Egyptologist. I am going to write down some simple time frame theories & you will see what this book is about: General View: The Hebrews came into Egypt through reuniting Joseph & his brothers. They experienced the Amarna period of primitive Monotheism. Akhenaton was over thrown & polytheism was reinstated as the Hebrews were enslaved. Moses came during Rameses II & the Exodus was during the last years of Rameses II or the Pharaoh Marneptah. Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Rameses II 1279-1213 BC Exodus last years of Rameses II or Marneptah. Problems: Biblical History is off by 180 years if counted back from the creation of Solomon's temple. Rameses II was a great conquer, & both he & his son Marneptah never wrote of 10 plagues or an Exodus. Both died as old men & their mummys are still with us. David Rohl's Theory: revised Egyptian history by shortening the 3rd Intermediate Period by almost 300 years. Tutimaios known as Dudimose is the Pharaoh of the Exodus Exodus 1447 BC Amarna period of Akhenaton = time of King David approx. 1000 BC. Proof: letters written between an Egyptian Pharaoh & King of Israel during that period. Rameses II = Shishak of 921 BC sack of Jerusalem. Proof: Rameses II used a monogram that comes close to Shishak. Problems: goes against establish Egyptian time frames or "If the Bible doesn't fit the Egyptian time frames then make the Egyptian time frames fit the Bible". Akhenaton is no longer the 1st political monotheist & seems out of place not influencing Moses & writing letters to King David. From Another Book I Read - "Akhenaton & Moses" by Ahmed Osman Ahmed Osman's Theory: Akhenaton is the same person as Moses Amarna period of Akhenaton 1352-1337/1334 BC Exodus after the overthrow of Akhenaton by Rameses I Problems: Moses doesn't die overlooking the Promise land of Canaan as stated in Deuteronomy 34 but dies without a known grave as did Akhenaton. Moses monotheism doesn't deal with a solar disc as a symbol of the one God or a replacement of a lesser Egyptian God, but is from an inherited convent. Other Dates of the Exodus: Josephus 1552 BC Sedar Olam Rabbah 1440 BC Book of Jubilees 2410 BC Early Church Fathers 1570 to 1320 BC I need to research Immanuel Velikovsky ideas on this subject matter. I just bought the book & will review it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2013
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Correcting the Biblical Chronology
Format: Hardcover
When I first begin my study of the Bible, I had purchased another book on archaeology and the first thing I realized is that nothing fit. The time of Solomon was impoverishment in Israel. When you read the Bible Solomon was the richest king ever. David Rohl's book Pharaohs and Kings changed all that. He persuasively shows where the chronology is wrong and when corrected things fall into place. What is commonly called the old testament comes to life. It is the greatest book on Biblical Archaeology ever written. Thank you David !!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019

recommand products